Incorrect charm name listed in `Charms packed:` output after pack
Metadata
Current evaluation
Reported `Charms packed:` output showing a stale charm name after packing a hybrid machine/k8s charm; author sed-i retracted it on 2023-04-14 ("My bad. Everything is ok.") and it was closed with no code change.
Resolution: closed not a bug
Reason: No fix was made: the original reporter sed-i posted the only comment on 2023-04-14 stating "My bad. Everything is ok." and the issue was closed by the author, confirming the pack output and metadata.yaml name were correct as reported.
Evaluated by: mr-cal-bot
No scores available.
Issue body
The grafana-agent charm is a hybrid machine/k8s repo.
After packing the machine charm,
```
tox -e render-machine
charmcraft clean
charmcraft pack
```
```
Packing the charm
Created 'grafana-agent_ubuntu-22.04-amd64_ubuntu-20.04-amd64.charm'.
Charms packed:
grafana-agent_ubuntu-22.04-amd64_ubuntu-20.04-amd64.charm
```
I then pack the k8s charm.
```
charmcraft clean
tox -e render-k8s
charmcraft pack
```
As a result, I see the same output:
```
Packing the charm
Created 'grafana-agent-k8s_ubuntu-22.04-amd64_ubuntu-20.04-amd64.charm'.
Charms packed:
grafana-agent-k8s_ubuntu-22.04-amd64_ubuntu-20.04-amd64.charm
```
However, the k8s charm is there
```
$ ls *.charm
grafana-agent-k8s_ubuntu-22.04-amd64_ubuntu-20.04-amd64.charm
grafana-agent_ubuntu-22.04-amd64_ubuntu-20.04-amd64.charm k8s.charm machine.charm
```
and correct:
```
$ unzip -p grafana-agent-k8s_ubuntu-22.04-amd64_ubuntu-20.04-amd64.charm metadata.yaml | grep name
name: grafana-agent-k8s
```
So seems like the output of the pack is picking up something incorrectly.
Evaluation history
| Date | Model | Scores | Action | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| stealth/space-bunny-alpha | — | closed not a bug | Reported `Charms packed:` output showing a stale charm name after packing a hybrid machine/k8s charm; author sed-i retracted it on 2023-04-14 ("My bad. Everything is ok.") and it was closed with no code change. | |
| stealth/space-bunny-alpha | — | closed not a bug | Closed without a fix after the author confirmed on 2023-04-14 that everything worked correctly and the report was their mistake. | |
| qwen3.6-35b-a3b-mtp-q6 | — | — | Author reported incorrect charm name in charmcraft pack output. After verifying the files were correct, the author closed the issue, stating it was a mistake and everything worked as expected. | |
| qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b | — | — | Author closed the issue as invalid, confirming the reported incorrect Charms packed output was a user error and the tool functioned correctly. | |
| qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b | — | — | Closed as abandoned. Reporter later confirmed the pack output was correct and self-resolved the false alarm. | |
| qwen3.6-35b-a3b-mtp-q6 | — | — | Author self-resolved the report, confirming the output discrepancy was a false alarm. Issue closed without code changes. |
Update history
No update history recorded yet.
Related issues
| Issue | Project | State | Summary | Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #2680 `name` field missing from packed charm's `metadata.yaml` when defined in `charmcraft.yaml` alongside a separate `metadata.yaml` | charmcraft | open | Packed charm metadata.yaml omits name when name is in charmcraft.yaml and separate metadata.yaml lacks it, making charm undeployable. Confirmed by second user; no maintainer triage yet. |