← Back to issue list

Support for extensions (command line)

View original Github issue

Metadata

Project
charmcraft
Number
#1242
Type
issue
State
closed
Author
tigarmo
Labels
Created
Updated
Closed

Current evaluation

Closed without implementation or discussion, indicating the feature request for a CLI extension framework was abandoned. No linked pull requests or resolution details were provided.

Suggested action:

No scores available.

Issue body

### What needs to get done Extension framework as done in Snapcraft and Rockcraft ### Why it needs to get done To support easy creation of charms without the complexities of each framework

Evaluation history

Date Model Scores Action Summary
qwen3.6-35b-a3b-mtp-q6 Closed without implementation or discussion, indicating the feature request for a CLI extension framework was abandoned. No linked pull requests or resolution details were provided.
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b The feature request for a command-line extension framework was closed without implementation. With zero comments and no follow-up activity, the proposal was abandoned or superseded by alternative development paths.
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b Closed without resolution or discussion. The proposed extension framework to simplify charm creation was abandoned.
qwen3.6-35b-a3b-mtp-q6 Closed without discussion or implementation, the command-line extension framework request was abandoned. No resolution or merge details were provided, indicating the feature remains unaddressed.
qwen3.6-35b-a3b-mtp-q6 Abandoned without implementation. The request for a command-line extension framework received no comments or resolution details.

Update history

No update history recorded yet.

Related issues

Issue Project State Summary Similarity
#274 Support Extensions CLI rockcraft closed Closed without implementation or discussion. The request for list-extensions and expand-extensions CLI commands was abandoned.
82%
#1238 Support for extensions (basic support) charmcraft closed Closed without implementation. The extension framework request was deferred, with maintainers pointing to canonical/rockcraft PRs 281 and 292 as the reference implementation instead.
73%