← Back to issue list

docs: add "How to manage 12-factor app charms"

View original Github issue

Metadata

Project
charmcraft
Number
#2048
Type
pull request
State
closed
Author
lengau
Labels
Created
Updated
Closed

Current evaluation

Superseded by PR #2083. The documentation conversion to RST with updated formatting was closed without merging as a replacement pull request was submitted.

Suggested action:

No scores available.

Issue body

I'm breaking down the content from PR #2010 into smaller chunks. This is "How to manage 12-factor app charms" converted to RST: https://github.com/canonical/charmcraft/blob/737976c943a601adccd883ffa6a276bce625c9a1/docs/howto/manage-12-factor-app-charms.md The main differences from the Markdown version: - Uses tabs instead of dropdowns (matching the Rockcraft docs: https://documentation.ubuntu.com/rockcraft/en/latest/how-to/build-a-12-factor-app-rock/) - "See also" blocks are added as cards Rendered link: https://canonical-charmcraft--2048.com.readthedocs.build/en/2048/howto/manage-12-factor-app-charms/ CRAFT-3819

Evaluation history

Date Model Scores Action Summary
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b Superseded by PR #2083. The documentation conversion to RST with updated formatting was closed without merging as a replacement pull request was submitted.
qwen3.6-35b-a3b-mtp-q6 Documentation update for managing 12-factor app charms was closed and superseded by PR #2083. The PR converted markdown to RST, implemented tabbed code blocks, and added see-also cards to align with Rockcraft standards.
qwen3.6-35b-a3b-mtp-q6 Converted 12-factor app charm management documentation to RST using tabbed code blocks and card-style cross-references. The pull request was closed and superseded by #2083.

Update history

No update history recorded yet.

Related issues

Issue Project State Summary Similarity
#2274 docs: fix typo in 'manage 12-factor app charm' charmcraft merged Merged after approval by two reviewers. Corrected a single typo in the 'manage 12-factor app charm' documentation. The change was integrated into the main branch despite some failing CI checks.
72%