← Back to issue list

Feature request: charmcraft revisions json / yaml output

View original Github issue

Metadata

Project
charmcraft
Number
#722
Type
issue
State
closed
Author
claudiubelu
Labels
Created
Updated
Closed

Current evaluation

Closed and superseded by issue #183, which tracks broader programmatic output support for charmcraft commands including JSON and YAML formatting.

Suggested action:

No scores available.

Issue body

Currently, the ``charmcraft revisions`` command does not support json / yaml outputs. JSON / YAML outputs can then be used further in various programmatic purposes. Charmcraft version: 1.5.0

Evaluation history

Date Model Scores Action Summary
qwen3.6-35b-a3b-mtp-q6 Closed and superseded by issue #183, which tracks broader programmatic output support for charmcraft commands including JSON and YAML formatting.
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b Closed and superseded by issue #183, which tracks programmatic output support for charmcraft commands. The JSON/YAML revisions output request was acknowledged and redirected to the dedicated tracking ticket.
qwen3.6-35b-a3b-mtp-q6 Closed as superseded. The request for JSON/YAML output in charmcraft revisions was acknowledged and redirected to issue #183 for tracking programmatic output support.
qwen3.6-35b-a3b-mtp-q6 Closed and superseded by issue #183, which tracks broader programmatic output support for charmcraft commands.

Update history

No update history recorded yet.

Related issues

Issue Project State Summary Similarity
#913 Add `charmcraft fmt` command charmcraft open Feature request for a charmcraft format command to apply opinionated YAML formatting to metadata.yaml, actions.yaml, config.yaml, and charmcraft.yaml. Triaged by maintainer who created a forum post for consensus; no implementation yet after over a year of inactivity.
72%
#940 Add yaml formatting feature in charmcraft status charmcraft closed The request to add YAML formatting to charmcraft status was abandoned. The maintainer clarified the format flag is for machine consumption, not human readability. The author agreed and closed the issue.
71%