If architecture after to is an array, it is not matched corretly
Metadata
Current evaluation
to clause with multiple selectors (e.g. to amd64,arm64) never matches because selectors use AND logic, not OR. Maintainers confirmed this is by design but documentation is misleading. mr-cal committed to fixing docs in June 2024; no evidence of completion since.
Suggested action: keep open
Reason: Maintainers mr-cal and dilyn-corner actively discussed the issue and confirmed the AND behavior is by design, with mr-cal explicitly stating 'I am happy to fix it and will try to make the document less misleading.' No labels or assignee were set, and there is no evidence the documentation fix was completed in the 486 days since last activity, so the documentation concern likely remains open.
Issue body
Evaluation history
| Date | Model | Scores | Action | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| qwen/qwen3.8-27b |
Impact:
40
Quick Win:
28.0
Staleness:
65
Complexity:
30
Confidence:
60
Support Request:
15
|
keep open | to clause with multiple selectors (e.g. to amd64,arm64) never matches because selectors use AND logic, not OR. Maintainers confirmed this is by design but documentation is misleading. mr-cal committed to fixing docs in June 2024; no evidence of completion since. | |
| qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b |
Staleness:
85
Complexity:
20
Confidence:
85
Support Request:
80
|
close not a bug | Clarification that the to clause uses AND logic for architecture selectors, not OR. Maintainers confirmed the behavior is intentional and noted documentation was misleading, with plans to update docs. | |
| qwen3.6-35b-a3b-mtp-q6 |
Staleness:
85
Complexity:
10
Confidence:
90
Support Request:
90
|
close not a bug | Clarification that to clause uses AND logic, making array syntax invalid for OR matching. Maintainers confirmed intended behavior and plan to update docs. | |
| qwen3.6-35b-a3b-mtp-q6 |
Staleness:
85
Complexity:
15
Confidence:
90
Support Request:
85
|
close not a bug | Grammar processor fails matching architecture arrays in to clauses. Discussion confirms to clauses use AND logic, making arrays invalid. Maintainer plans to update docs and add validation to reject unsupported syntax. Awaiting implementation. |
Update history
No update history recorded yet.
Related issues
No related issues found above the similarity threshold.