chore: add a CODEOWNERS file
Metadata
Current evaluation
Merged the initial CODEOWNERS file, but rejected requests to add specific teams. Maintainers withdrew the additions because CODEOWNERS requires repository write access, which they declined to grant.
Suggested action: —
No scores available.
Issue body
This file follows the standard Starcraft ownership model, but there might be more nuances for snapcraft. For example, should there be additional owners on things like the gnome extension?
- [x] Have you followed the [guidelines for contributing](https://github.com/canonical/snapcraft/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)?
- [x] Have you signed the [CLA](http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/contributors/)?
- [x] Have you successfully run `tox run -m lint`?
- [x] Have you successfully run `tox run -e test-py310`? (supported versions: `py39`, `py310`, `py311`, `py312`)
-----
Evaluation history
| Date | Model | Scores | Action | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b | — | — | Merged the initial CODEOWNERS file, but rejected requests to add specific teams. Maintainers withdrew the additions because CODEOWNERS requires repository write access, which they declined to grant. | |
| qwen3.6-35b-a3b-mtp-q6 | — | — | Merged the CODEOWNERS file but reverted requested team additions. Maintainers declined to add groups as codeowners due to repository write access security concerns. | |
| qwen3.6-35b-a3b-mtp-q6 | — | — | Merged a base CODEOWNERS file. Requests to add ROS and industrial team owners were rejected due to write access restrictions, so only the initial configuration was included. |
Update history
No update history recorded yet.
Related issues
| Issue | Project | State | Summary | Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #121 chore: add a CODEOWNERS file | imagecraft | closed | Adding a CODEOWNERS file was rejected and the pull request closed. The maintainer confirmed the team decided against adopting the file, leaving the change abandoned. | |
| #589 chore: add a CODEOWNERS file | craft-application | closed | Merged. The CODEOWNERS file was added to establish project maintainership rules following reviewer approval. | |
| #142 chore: add a CODEOWNERS file | craft-archives | closed | Merged directly without review. Added a CODEOWNERS file to establish repository ownership and review responsibilities. | |
| #295 chore: add CODEOWNERS file | starbase | merged | A CODEOWNERS file was added and merged following approval. The update contributed 9 lines to one file, meeting contribution guidelines and passing review checks. | |
| #2035 chore: add CODEOWNERS file | charmcraft | merged | Merged a chore pull request adding a CODEOWNERS file. The change introduced 12 lines to a single file, received approval from two reviewers, and completed without comments or CI failures. | |
| #2647 chore: update `CODEOWNERS` | charmcraft | merged | Merged after two approvals. Updates CODEOWNERS with four line changes to align repository ownership rules. | |
| #1095 chore: add CODEOWNERS | craft-parts | merged | Merged to add a CODEOWNERS file formalizing Claudio's ownership of craft-parts. Approved by two reviewers and merged despite linter failures, with all other CI checks passing. The change adds 12 lines to one file. | |
| #768 chore: add a CODEOWNERS file | rockcraft | closed | Merged after approval, adding a CODEOWNERS file to automate review assignments. Reviewers suggested including the rocks team for docs and rockcraft, which was incorporated into the final configuration. | |
| #937 chore: update CODEOWNERS | craft-application | merged | Merged CODEOWNERS updates assigning @steinbro ownership, removing authors from changelog, and enforcing reviewer assignment. Approved by two reviewers, passed CI checks, and modified one file with seven additions and two deletions. | |
| #429 chore: update codeowners | craft-cli | merged | Merged an update to the CODEOWNERS file to reflect current year responsibilities. Approved by two reviewers with all CI checks passing. Modified one file with five additions and two deletions. |