← Back to issue list

test: add a review-tools helper for Spread tests

View original Github issue

Metadata

Project
snapcraft
Number
#6531
Type
pull request
State
open
Author
Deep-Axe
Labels
—
Created
Updated
Closed
—

Current evaluation

Adds a review helper for Spread tests to run review-tools on built snaps. Part of #6510. CI passing, awaiting first review.

Suggested action: needs review

Reason: CI is fully passing and the change is focused (test infrastructure helper for review-tools). It has no reviews yet and is only 1 day old, so it's ready for maintainer review. The author hasn't locally run `make lint && make test` (unchecked box), but CI lint checks pass.

Evaluated by: mr-cal-bot

Impact: 25 Quick Win: 14 Complexity: 20 Confidence: 75 Actionability: 70

Issue body

Adds a [`review`](https://github.com/canonical/snapcraft/pull/6531/files#diff-2dbe9a20d857eb4b506f59b1c4a7b6896ccc6ecc4058a405d44dc5634e161a3c) helper so Spread tests can run review-tools on the snaps they build. - `review-tools` is installed once in the project prepare and kept across task cleanup. - `review <snap>` copies the snap to `$HOME` (review-tools is strictly confined), runs the review, and fails on any error or warning. `review --no-fail <snap>` prints the JSON and passes, for snaps that are expected to have findings. - The manifest tests now use `review` instead of calling review-tools directly. - [`classic-patchelf`](https://github.com/canonical/snapcraft/pull/6531/files#diff-62f1b1923d7c70fd692001d3d88e28b785bbd0e2f5a22da2d70dd94caf351f87R50-R56) uses `--no-fail` and checks that the only finding is the expected classic-confinement error. Other tests will be moved to `review` in follow-up PRs. Part of #6510 --- - [x] I've followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/canonical/snapcraft/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md). - [x] I've signed the [CLA](http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/contributors/). - [ ] I've successfully run `make lint && make test`. - [x] I've added or updated any relevant documentation. - [x] In documents I changed, I [added a meta description](https://canonical-starflow.readthedocs-hosted.com/how-to/add-a-page-meta-description/) if one was missing. - [ ] I've updated the relevant release notes.

Evaluation history

Date Model Scores Action Summary
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b
Impact: 25
Quick Win: 14
Complexity: 20
Confidence: 75
Actionability: 70
needs review Adds a review helper for Spread tests to run review-tools on built snaps. Part of #6510. CI passing, awaiting first review.

Update history

Date Change
updated
updated
updated
updated
created

Related work

  • Related To: snapcraft#6510 (confidence 95%)

    This PR is part of issue #6510 which tracks running review-tools on all spread tests that build snaps.

Related issues

Issue Project State Summary Similarity
#6510 Spread tests should run review-tools on snaps snapcraft open Enhancement to add review-tools checks to Spread tests. Triaged, with active PR #6531 implementing the first part.
85%
#2235 tests: cover manifest generation with review-tools snapcraft merged PR merged into master: manifest-generation spread tests extended to actually build a snap and run review-tools.snap-review on it (LP #1790026); the review-tools step survives today in tests/spread/_common/manifest-creation.
75%
#1272 tests: initial setup for the snapcraft snap tests with spread snapcraft merged Merged PR #1272 as commit 545344442, adding initial Spread-based test infrastructure for the snapcraft snap.
72%