ci: Add missing permissions to QA lint workflow
Metadata
Current evaluation
PR #600 was closed unmerged despite all CI checks passing; no merge commit or recorded replacement was found.
Resolution: closed stale
Reason: The tracker records no merged commit, superseding change, or closing maintainer comment. Earlier commit cd8d487 (PR #557) already set QA read permissions, but no explicit link explains this closure.
Evaluated by: mr-cal-bot
No scores available.
Issue body
The QA workflow was invoking the shared lint workflow without the permissions it expects on pull request runs. This updates the lint job to explicitly grant the read access needed for repository contents and PR metadata.
Evaluation history
| Date | Model | Scores | Action | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| stealth/space-bunny-alpha | — | closed stale | PR #600 was closed unmerged despite all CI checks passing; no merge commit or recorded replacement was found. | |
| stealth/space-bunny-alpha | — | closed superseded | Closed unmerged as redundant; the QA workflow already had the requested read permissions from PR #557 (commit cd8d487). | |
| stealth/space-bunny-alpha | — | closed stale | Closed without a recorded merge or replacement; the PR added QA lint read permissions and passed all reported CI checks. | |
| qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b |
Impact:
20
Quick Win:
15
Complexity:
5
Confidence:
85
Actionability:
80
|
needs review | Adds missing read permissions for repository contents and PR metadata to the QA lint workflow. All CI checks passing, awaiting review. |
Update history
| Date | Change |
|---|---|
| closed | |
| updated | |
| created |
Related work
-
Duplicate Of:
canonical/starbase#557
(confidence 88%)
Commit cd8d487 has the same QA read-permissions focus and is present in repository history.
Related issues
| Issue | Project | State | Summary | Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1741 ci: Add missing permissions to QA lint workflow | craft-parts | closed | Closed unmerged after the equivalent QA workflow permission fix landed in commit 585b7237. | |
| #193 ci: Add missing permissions to QA lint workflow | debcraft | closed | Closed unmerged: all16 CI checks passed (incl. zizmor, lint / files, CLA) but review stayed pending (0 reviewers, 0 comments) and no merge commit or superseding change was recorded. | |
| #216 ci: Add missing permissions to QA lint workflow | craft-grammar | closed | PR #216 (lengau) added explicit contents/pull-requests read permissions to the QA lint job and was approved, but the lint / files check failed; the PR was closed unmerged after ~8 days with no resolution recorded. | |
| #6438 ci: Add missing permissions to QA lint workflow | snapcraft | closed | PR closed unmerged by lengau as redundant: the QA workflow (.github/workflows/qa.yaml) already grants workflow-level contents/pull-requests read permissions on main, so job-level permissions in the lint job were unnecessary. | |
| #427 ci: Add missing permissions to QA lint workflow | craft-store | closed | PR #427 (lengau) added job-level contents/pull-requests read permissions to craft-store's QA lint job (+3/-0). All CI checks passed but review stayed pending; closed unmerged in favour of workflow-level fix PR #428. | |
| #1375 ci: Add missing permissions to QA lint workflow | rockcraft | closed | PR #1375 (rockcraft) adding job-level contents/pull-requests read permissions to the QA lint workflow was closed unmerged by @lengau as redundant — the workflow's existing workflow-level permissions were already sufficient. | |
| #1191 ci: Fix QA workflow permissions for reusable lint job | craft-application | closed | PR #1191 was approved but closed unmerged; commit 5353ad50 records its lint permission change, while lint/files and title-policy checks still failed. | |
| #256 ci: Add missing permissions to QA lint workflow | craft-archives | merged | Job-level lint permissions PR closed as redundant by maintainer lengau: workflow-level read permissions already configured on main; superseded by merged PR #257 setting workflow-level read permissions. | |
| #1731 ci: fix permissions for QA workflow | craft-parts | closed | Closed unmerged after approval: #1731 proposed explicit read permissions for incoming Starflow QA jobs, but no resolving commit landed and remaining CI checks never completed. | |
| #446 ci: Allow QA reusable workflows to read pull request metadata | imagecraft | closed | The QA permissions fix was approved but closed unmerged after the Conventional Commits policy check failed; no resolving commit or replacement was recorded. |